Overclocker posts early Ryzen 7 9850X3D binning data as more chips are queued
A new set of Ryzen 7 9850X3D binning were shared by overclockers sugi0lover and chunmu82, who have been logging early samples.
In the original post, chunmu82 explained the whole exercise as silicon lottery tracking, not a gaming FPS contest. Overclocked said the first 13 results are only the start, and a larger batch is expected next. He also suggested that overseas “sample” chips showing up online can score higher in ASUS SP readouts than typical retail chips seen locally, based on what chunmu82 could find through searches.
In case you are not familiar with “SP score”. This is an ASUS BIOS readout that stands for “Silicon Prediction”. It is ASUS’s own estimate of how “good” a given CPU sample is, based largely on the CPU’s factory voltage and frequency curve data (VID or V F curve) and ASUS’s internal formula.
Source: chunmu82
HardwareLuxx also contributed with their own score, using a similar (but not identical) setup. The original testing setup mentioned for the first batch was an X870E APEX board paired with a G.SKILL DDR5-6000 CL26 kit and a custom water loop set to a 20°C water temperature. Overclocker said memory-related results looked healthy, but most chips did not look far from what was seen with Ryzen 7 9800X3D. Chunmu82 also wrote that Ryzen 7 9800X3D appears to have better core yield, while Ryzen 7 9850X3D looked slightly better for PBO boost behavior.
HardwareLuxx crated their table with an inclusion of their sample data with a clock of 5.624 GHz, an average voltage of 1.320 V, and an average SP score of 120 across the 13 entries, with SP values spanning 118 to 121. Hardwareluxx also reported that higher clocks on Ryzen 7 9850X3D come with higher voltage compared to Ryzen 7 9800X3D in review testing, quoting 1.341 V vs 1.119 V for single-core boost.
As explained, this data is not fully comparable. That would require the use of the same motherboard, which in this case wasn’t the case. German media used ProArt X670E-Creator WIFI but the used similar DDR5-6000 memory.
If these binning results show anything, it is that the 9850X3D looks a lot like the 9800X3D, just clocked higher. For overclocking, the 9800X3D should land in a similar range.
| Comparison of binning data for the Ryzen 7 9850X3D | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| HardwareLuxx | Frequency | Voltage | SP Silicon Preditction Score |
| 9850X3D CPU #1 | 5.625 MHz | 1.290V | 120 |
| 9850X3D CPU #2 | 5.625 MHz | 1.271 V | 120 |
| 9850X3D CPU #3 | 5.625 MHz | 1.272V | 120 |
| 9850X3D CPU #4 | 5.625 MHz | 1.299V | 121 |
| 9850X3D CPU #5 | 5.625 MHz | 1.287V | 120 |
| 9850X3D CPU #6 | 5.625 MHz | 1.318V | 119 |
| 9850X3D CPU #7 | 5.625 MHz | 1.301V | 120 |
| 9850X3D CPU #8 | 5.625 MHz | 1.325V | 120 |
| 9850X3D CPU #9 | 5.625 MHz | 1.317V | 119 |
| 9850X3D CPU #10 | 5.625 MHz | 1.311 V | 120 |
| 9850X3D CPU #11 | 5.622 MHz | 1.355V | 118 |
| 9850X3D CPU #12 | 5.624 MHz | 1.338V | 119 |
| 9850X3D CPU #13 | 5.611 MHz | 1.348V | 118 |
| HWL Sample | 5.624 MHz | 1.320V | 120 |
Source: Uniko’s Hardware, HardwareLuxx
Source: VideoCardz
Author: VideoCardz